ADTO News
Comparison between the Ringlock Scaffolding and the Cuplock Scaffolding
Projects |
Comparison |
||
Surface treatment |
Painted
|
Hot dipped galvanized |
/ |
Service life |
7 years
|
More than 20 years
|
Ringlock scaffolding system has a longer service life than the cuplock scaffolding system.
|
Erection efficiency |
105 cubic meters per working days
|
182 cubic meters per working days |
Erection and dismantlement efficiency of ringlock scaffolding system is higher than the efficiency of cuplock scaffolding system. Enhancing construction efficiency. Time-saving and labor-saving. |
Dismantlement efficiency |
105 cubic meters per working days
|
240 cubic meters per working days |
|
Construction ladders |
No ladder/Erecting by fastener type steel pipe
|
Specialized modular staircase |
Ringlock scaffolding system has more stable structure than cuplock scaffolding system. |
Materials consumption (tons) |
157
|
91 |
Ringlock scaffolding system just consumed about 58% materials of cuplock scaffolding. |
Stability |
Low
|
High |
/ |
Convenience and flexibility |
Too heavy to handle and erect
|
Easy to erect and dismantle |
/ |
Safety |
Easy to rust, regularly manual descaling and paint spraying are needed. Material and labor costs are consumed. With the increasing times of descaling, the thinning tube wall will have the potential risks for accidents.
|
Wear-resistance. Longer service life. Modular designation, simple structure. Low possibilities to deformed. Stable structure. |
Hot dipped galvanized ringlock scaffolding system is safer than painted cuplock scaffolding system. |