Scaffolding is an important construction tool. Since the 1960s, due to the advantages of simple processing, convenient handling, strong universality, tubular scaffolding has been commonly widely used in China, accounting for the vast majority of the total use of scaffolding. While entering into the 21^st century, the shortage of tubular scaffolding has been revealed: poor safety assurance, low construction work efficiency, and the highest build height are only 33 meters, which cannot satisfy high-rise building construction requirements. Now, the tubular scaffolding has already been gradually eliminated by the market.

The ringlock scaffolding, with the structure of lightweight, high strength, good stability, quick disassembly, and other advantages, arises at the right moment and becomes the hot-sale product of the scaffolding market. Today, the ADTO Building Materials Group will write a passage about the comparison of ringlock scaffolding and conventional scaffolding.

Some construction parties will think that the ringlock scaffolding costs more, but ringlock scaffolding products have their own advantages. Because the material of the disk-type support is all made of low-alloy structural steel, the main components are treated with internal and external hot-dip galvanizing anti-corrosion process, and the connection mode is the international mainstream scaffold connection mode, each node can have 8 directions of the connection, respectively can be used for horizontal bar, oblique bar, positioning bar connection. The vertical, horizontal, oblique three axes of the scaffold back intersection at a point, the transmission force in place is not eccentric, after the connection to make the element of each frame approximate to the lattice column, increased the stability of the structure.

Under normal circumstances, the spacing of the pole is 1.5 meters, 1.8 meters, 2.4 meters, 3.0 meters. The distance between the bars is 1.5 m. The maximum spacing can be up to 3 meters, so the use of the same supporting area will be reduced by two-thirds compared to the traditional bowl buckle type support frame, and the weight will be reduced by half. In addition, due to the use of less disc scaffold, lightweight, operators can be more convenient for assembly, the efficiency can be increased more than 3 times per person per day can be installed 150-300 cubic meters of the body.

Through the comparison, we found that the cost of ringlock scaffolding is significantly higher than the cuplock scaffolding and tubular scaffolding. But from the comprehensive aspect, the ringlock scaffolding still has certain advantages. When it comes to the terrain with a large leveling foundation, especially the bridge construction of mountain terrain, the circular scaffolding is still better than the traditional fastener bracket in terms of economy, and to meet the requirements of energy-saving, material saving, high efficiency, and environmental protection. In the future bridge construction, the ringlock scaffolding may gradually occupy more market share.